Thursday, February 4, 2010

When I'm 94

BELLA COUNIHAN
February 5, 2010 - 7:20AM

Be the first to comment

A creaking sound comes from an old wooden chair rocking on a porch on Mount Ainslie. Once home to ghouls and evil spirits bent on attacking parliamentarians, two very elderly retired gentleman sit and watch over the city of Canberra. The year is 2050 and the place has changed a bit . . .

"Kevin, who'd have thunk we'd be sitting here in the year 2050 with everything we'd set out to achieve done and dusted. People are working well into their 70s, we're more productive than ever and that 5 per cent target for emissions reduction means we've finally put Canberra on the map as a beach-side town. The rising sea level has had some benefits after all," said the aged ex-Treasurer. In the background, Bay Burley Griffin slowly lapped at the shores of Parliament Hill.

The 94-year-old Wayne Swan continued, "I'm so glad little Rudd and Swan Junior, now running the country, didn't have anything to disturb their progress to the top. The war on binge drinking got rid of people on the piss, the war on drugs cleared up any sneaky reefers or pills hanging around and the internet filter stopped them from watching anything as corrupting as porn."

Paul Keating, now a head in a jar on the porch opposite, yells out "Yeah and the general fun-ectomy that you guys performed on Australian politics means they're the most boring politicians ever! You scumbags look exciting next to them!"

"Oh shut up, Paul," Wayne retorted. "I'm in the middle of reminiscing here."

A wrinkly Rudd looks up at his old running mate, nodding heartily. "Indeed Wayne what an agenda of work we enacted in all those due seasons that we had together. We put that climate condom on a magic pudding for complementarity of synthesis and further developed the multilateral terms of reference. Firstly, our commitment to. . ."

As Rudd trailed off into a characteristic rant, Swan knew that dementia had truly taken hold of the elderly Rudd, although often it was hard to tell the difference. Wayne remembered back when he released the intergenerational report, when they had both looked to the future. "Who could have predicted that we would still be here in the year 2050?" he thought.

But his jittery mind worried. He worried about the burden that he, now an nonagenarian, placed on his own precious economy. He was now among the 23 per cent of people over the age of 65 and despite all his efforts as treasurer he was still felt like just another old bloke putting pressure on infrastructure, health and aged care. Not to mention pressure on his own offspring, already burdened with running the country. "Poor Swan junior", he thought, "how will he cope with all these old people increasing government spending, less revenue coming in from early retirees and debt up to the eyeballs. Even worse than when I was treasurer. Now every third person is working to support old farts like me. It's just not fair. I can't even surf anymore."

"Don't look down Wayne," Rudd senior chimed in. "At least we knocked over Howard, Turnbull and even Abbott. Pity we didn't get Kelly O'Dwyer too. Then we would have really had them. I mean fair shake of the Waltzing Matilda Swan, you and I did our best with the complimentarity . . . and the condom . . . and the wacko the diddly-o . . . zzzz"

As the ageing ex-PM slowly dribbled into his vest, Swan thought maybe the senile Rudd had a point. Maybe getting old was just a part of life, governments would just have to get used to it and cope the best they can. He mumbled to himself "maybe it was better to reflect on your achievements". Rudd continued to babble louder in the background and Paul's head yelled across "would you shut him up Wayne?! He's going on like a thousand-day clock and doing my head in!"

"All right" said Swan, "time to eat your soylent green, Kevin."

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

White Power Likes this - Racist Facebook groups

BELLA COUNIHAN


"Why the Aussies Hate us" splashed across the face of a bruised young man on the cover of Indian magazine Outlookcaused great angst in the hearts of many this week. Are we really racist? As Rudd's nephew and occasional wearer of a KKK robe Van Than Rudd says, do we really have a "dominant culture" of discrimination? Let's look back to Australia Day, with the riot squad on standby, most of us had a quiet one by the pool, or next to the barbie having one too many burnt sunscreen flavoured sausages. But in the background there was something different going on — a Southern Cross tattooee with a shirt proudly stating "We Grew Here, You Flew Here" or a slogan "F--- Off, We're Full" written on some flag-clad 15-year-old bogan's chest. This is usually restricted to those in the herd limited by brain cells and fuelled by the fifth VB tinny. The slogans are ignored and forgotten and we reassure ourselves again that we are not a racist nation until we see it all next time.

But this nationalist prejudice that boils to the surface on Australia Day is kept up year around on the world wide web. Unfortunately, the internet's freedom brings the freedom to be racist and no where is this more apparent than with Facebook groups. From these "hate groups" it would be hard to call Australians anything but racist. Even after all the violence, many refer specifically to Indians, groups like "Stop whinging Indians" and "Australia: Indians, You have the right to leave". There have been increasingly strong calls to ban them. So should we? Would it even be possible? Or should we look at why these "hate groups" have turned up in the first place.

Excluding the Indian specific racist drivel, there are also more broad hate groups (such as "Mate speak English, you're in Australia now", "Im (sic) Australian - We grew here you flew here", "SPEAK ENGLISH OR PISS OFF!!" and "F--- OFF WE'RE FULL") floating around Facebook's environs. And what do they all have in common, apart from some pretty poor grammar and spelling by their participants (particularly ironic in the case of the group "SPEAK ENGLISH OR PISS OFF!!")? They have a lot of members, some even going viral.

The general gist of these groups is to start any sentence on a discussion board or wall post with "I'm not racist but . . ." and then extend the usual elitist anti-PC fuzzy protection of Australian "culture" revival Hansonite "patriotism". This usually extends to telling stories about how an immigrant taxi driver you met once didn't know where you wanted to go so you called him a FOB (fresh off the boat for those who don't know) and told him to go back to where the "f" he came from.

These sites in effect have become a forum for this anger and simplistic nationalism, where members fuel others in back and forth online discussion. Knowing that there are other people as fearful of that immigrant taxi driver as you is a powerful thing. But what can Facebook itself do about it?

The short answer is not much. The popular social media site with more than 350 million active users has extensive terms and conditions that restrict what users can put up. The site directs users to not post "content that is hateful, threatening, pornographic, or that contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence". It also stipulates that Facebook can "remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this statement". But this is definitely the exception rather than the rule — Facebook has only taken down pages inextreme circumstances or when there has been a "direct call for violence". The evidence would have to be pretty compelling, just being offensive to the rest of us isn't enough.

But simply being offensive is not why these groups have come about. It stems from a Cronulla riots type fear that something of "ours" is being taken away; of society disappearing down the rabbit hole of some "other" culture. Even if you're not really sure what constitutes "ours" or who or what the "other" really is. Perhaps this nationalist revival on Facebook is because some are unable to define "our" culture in the first place, possibly because it is and always will be an amalgam of different foreign influences. One member railing on the Facebook group entitled "Australia - The Right to Leave" even mistakenly listed "In God We Trust" as our national motto, oblivious to its American origin. The assimilation of other cultures in this country can get confusing for these guys too.

So do we just put up with looking racist to the rest of the world? On the Facebook level, one can join anti-discriminatory groups. There are plenty out there trying to counteract the hate groups ("1,000,000 Aussies against Racism", "F--- off, Xenophobes we're full" and "Australians against Racism and Discrimination"). You can even go to your local Indian and have a Vindaloo Against Violence on February 24. But in the end, you can't ban a T-shirt slogan or a Facebook group. But you can call it what is, disguised blue singlet racism confused and unable to define the thing it is trying so desperately to protect.

iiNet wins landmark case for ISPs

http://www.theage.com.au/business/iinet-slays-hollywood-in-landmark-piracy-case-20100204-nedw.html

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

North and South Korea at night - Electricity Gap


France refuses a citizenship over full Islamic veil

Quote from French Immigration Minister, Eric Besson: "It became apparent during the regulation investigation and the prior interview that this person was compelling his wife to wear the all-covering veil, depriving her of the freedom to come and go with her face uncovered, and rejected the principles of secularism and equality between men and women," More here.

Macquarie Bank adviser caught assessing Kerr's assets

Fired much?